It
was never my intention to own five dogs and a cat. But, whenever I see
an animal in need, I can’t not help. Somehow, my husband and I always
find room for one more.
I
also never said it was easy. My husband and I are certainly not
millionaires. And vet bills don’t ever seem to get cheaper. Still, we
wouldn’t have it any other way.
That
being said, I was very upset to find out that counties and cities place
limits on the number of animals that you are allowed to own. I
understand that the powers that be are trying to prevent noise
pollution, but, that can be attributed
to a careless owner. We are always quick to nip any excessive barking
in the bud. Who wants to hear a pack of dogs barking for hours on end?
Yet,
we still have a neighbor who lives down the street that allows its’ dog
to bark continuously. And the dog is small and kept indoors! I must say,
it does drive me crazy. I can’t fathom how the owner can put up with
it.
Then, there is the fear of
over breeding. However, the counties and cities also include that the
animals must be spayed/neutered. And I agree with this wholeheartedly.
I cannot tell you how many kittens have been discovered in our town
within the last three weeks. We do need to control the pet population,
as Bob Barker always suggested.
But, my real issue is with the word “hoarding.” To me, hoarding occurs when you have an outrageously large number of animals, say 15 or more.
There is no way that a person can afford to take care of that many
animals. The food bill alone would be enough to cause someone to go
bankrupt. Dog food is not cheap!
And
I also tend to think of hoarders as abusive. They do not see to the
needs of their animals, physical and social as well as their basic
needs. Then, fights between the large groups of animals occur because
life becomes a survival of
the fittest. This is certainly no way for an animal to live.
However,
there are some hoarders that simply love animals. My husband and I
were watching a show about the Animal Task Force in Florida. Two
officers approached the home of a woman who was hoarding 13 dogs. But,
the dogs were all being
well cared for. They had plenty of food and water and were even kept
inside the house. There were no signs of abuse. Just an abundance of
love.
The
woman claimed that she was simply trying to foster dogs that were about
to be euthanized at the local shelter. She had no intention of keeping
them all and was in the process of finding them forever homes. I could
totally relate to
this woman!
My heart breaks whenever I see dogs at charity events wearing the “Adopt Me” sign. I want to take them all home with me where I know that they will be given the love and attention that they deserve.
My heart breaks whenever I see dogs at charity events wearing the “Adopt Me” sign. I want to take them all home with me where I know that they will be given the love and attention that they deserve.
The
officers told the woman that she had two weeks to find homes for the
dogs or the dogs would be taken back to the shelter and she would be
fined (and possibly face jail time). Within the two weeks, she managed
to find homes for all
but four of the dogs and I believe that she owned two of them.
This is an example of a good hoarder. She meant the dogs no harm, but
to give them hope and a second chance at life.
I
feel that if you have the means to support the animals and they are
spayed/neutered and well-behaved (no dog fighting rings or late night
bark fests), that you should be allowed to own as many animals as you
wish. This is the United States
of America where we pride ourselves on having freedoms that are denied
to the citizens of other countries. Yet, the government seems to
continue to whittle away at these freedoms by constantly placing
limitations on them.
What agitates me even more is that
some people appear to be exempt from the rules. Why? They are famous!
I read in one magazine article that Mariah Carey owns 22 Jack
Russells. Twenty-two! How do you get away with something like that?
Bribe the city officials? Bribe the police officers?
Then there is Paris Hilton. She
recently posted a video of her seven dogs on Instagram. They were all
sitting in their “doggie mansion,” as she called it. And it truly was!
A chandelier was dangling above their heads. A sweeping staircase
led up to a second level that was decorated in a princess motif. I
have to admit, it looked nicer than my house!
So, why are these ladies able to get
away with breaking city ordinances? I once inquired of our local
government what it would take to be able to raise the limit of how many
dogs we can own. I was told that our house would have to be re-zoned
as a kennel. A kennel! Then, our taxes would skyrocket due to the
re-zoning.
Of course, many people simply say,
“Adopt as many as you want. Who’s going to find out?” But, I would
prefer to go about it the legal way. And I am positive that I would not
be able to pay the fine that I would receive and could NEVER
be able to make the gut wrenching decision of which dog to “get rid
of.”
However, when volunteering at an
adoption event for a local rescue group, I met a woman who told me that
she currently had 14 dogs in her house. She was very secretive about it
and said, “My vet gives me the dogs that nobody wants. I
take care of them while he tries to find them a home. This way, they
stay out of the humane societies and are not in danger of being
euthanized.”
As it turns out, there are many of
these secret “underground dog railroads” within the area. No one is
trying to break any rules. They are simply trying to save lives.
The government does not place a limit
on how many children a family can have. If they did, the Duggars would
be in serious trouble! We would revolt and tell the government that
they are being unconstitutional. So, why are those that
are choosing to have animals instead of children being penalized?
I have seen plenty of people who have
had a large number of children that were not truly able to care for
them. So, what does the government do? They offer food stamps and
other provisions to help ease costs for such families.
Unlike dogs, humans have the ability
to reason. If you know you cannot support six children, why do you
continue to have them? Then, these families become a burden to the
entire nation as a portion of our tax money goes to help meet their
basic needs.
I hope that other fur parents feel the same. We need to stand together and speak for those that don't have a voice. The government should not place a limit on love.
No comments:
Post a Comment